<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Detroit Business Law &#187; New Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/tag/new-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com</link>
	<description>Resources for Metro-Detroit Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NLRB Delays Effective Date of Its Employee Rights Notice Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2012/01/03/nlrb-delays-effective-date-of-its-employee-rights-notice-rule/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nlrb-delays-effective-date-of-its-employee-rights-notice-rule</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2012/01/03/nlrb-delays-effective-date-of-its-employee-rights-notice-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=1644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Labor Relations Board agreed last week to delay the effective date of its controversial new Employee Rights Notice Rule until April 30, 2012 (available at http://www.nlrb.gov/news/nlrb-postpones-effective-date-rights-posting-rule-april-30). The Rule requires that non-exempted employers post a notice of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act.  Under the rule, most employers will be required to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The National Labor Relations Board agreed last week to delay the effective date of its controversial new Employee Rights Notice Rule until April 30, 2012 (available at <a href="http://www.nlrb.gov/news/nlrb-postpones-effective-date-rights-posting-rule-april-30">http://www.nlrb.gov/news/nlrb-postpones-effective-date-rights-posting-rule-april-30</a>). The Rule requires that non-exempted employers post a notice of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act.  Under the rule, most employers will be required to post the 11-by-17-inch notice. The notice is available for free from the NLRB through its website. The notice can either be downloaded and printed or sent via mail.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Employee Notice Rule is generally considered to be pro labor. The notice outlines the numerous rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Among these rights are the right to organize, join, or form a union; strike or picket; as well as the right to complain directly to the employer. The notice also explains many of the restrictions placed on employers under the NLRA. For example, the notice states that it is illegal for employers to fire employees for threatening to close a workplace if a union is created, question employees about union support, or firing employees because they choose to join a union.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The NLRB agreed to postpone the implementation of the date at the request of a federal judge. The rule is currently the subject of litigation and the NLRB believes that postponing the effective date will help resolve the litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2012/01/03/nlrb-delays-effective-date-of-its-employee-rights-notice-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CARD Act &#8211; How the New Credit Card Law Works</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2010/02/24/card-act-how-the-new-credit-card-law-works/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=card-act-how-the-new-credit-card-law-works</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2010/02/24/card-act-how-the-new-credit-card-law-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa L. Demorest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa L. Demorest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of 2009 (or “CARD Act”) went into effect on Monday, February 22.  The purpose of this Act was to prevent credit card companies from using predatory lending practices and excessive penalties for credit card customers. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/wallet.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-854" title="wallet" src="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/wallet.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="135" /></a>The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of 2009 (or “CARD Act”) went into effect on Monday, February 22.  The purpose of this Act was to prevent credit card companies from using predatory lending practices and excessive penalties for credit card customers.  Note, however, that the CARD Act only applies to personal credit cards, not business credit cards.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Key provisions of the CARD Act include:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Interest rates on existing balances cannot be changed unless (1) your payment is 60 or more days late; or (2) you have an introductory rate that expires.</li>
<li>If a payment is more then 60 days late, but your payments for the next 6 months are all on-time, the credit card company must reduce your interest rate back to the original rate.</li>
<li>Interest rates on new purchases can be changed, but the credit card company must give you 45 days notice before raising your rate.  You can opt out of the rate change, but that means your account will be closed and you will have five years to pay off the existing balance at the existing interest rate.  There are some exceptions to this rule, however.  For example, if you have a variable rate card tied to the prime rate, this provision does not apply.</li>
<li>Credit card companies can no longer use the “universal default” provision that some were using.  If you pay late or default on any account (credit card, utility, etc.), other card issuers can no longer raise your interest rate on your existing balance on those cards.</li>
<li>Credit card companies can no longer approve a charge that exceeds your limit and then charge you an over-limit fee and penalty interest rate.  Beware of “opt-in” offers to avoid over-limit fees, as this is a scam.</li>
<li>You cannot be charged for paying online, by mail, or over the phone, unless you speak to a live operator and then they must disclose the fee before you pay.</li>
<li>Payment due dates must be the same every month, and if the due date falls on a holiday or weekend, the payment is due the next business day.</li>
<li>Your bill must now disclose how long it will take to pay off the current balance if you only pay the minimum amount each month, as well as the total amount of principal and interest you would pay over that time period.</li>
<li>Anyone under 21 cannot get a credit card without either (1) proof of income to pay the bills or (2) an adult co-signer.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">One problem with the CARD Act, however, is that it was signed into law in May 2009, but did not become effective until this week.  This gave credit card companies significant time to find ways around the new laws, including cutting credit limits and raising interest rates before the restrictions on such practices went into effect.  Some other new negative practices include:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Closing accounts or charging fees for inactivity or even for “low activity”</li>
<li>The return of annual fees to many cards – even if you have never had an annual fee on a particular card, there is nothing to stop the card issuer from charging one now</li>
<li>Converting fixed rate cards to variable rate cards, and setting these rates with a floor that they will never fall below</li>
<li>Redefining terms of certain fees, such as what is considered an “international transaction”</li>
<li>Increasing balance transfer fees and cash advance fees</li>
<li>Adding fees for paper statements</li>
<li>Changing the terms of rewards programs or eliminating such programs altogether</li>
<li>Stricter review of who is issued credit</li>
<li>Reducing credit limits without warning</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Pay attention to all correspondence from your credit card company, and if they are acting in a way that should be covered by the CARD Act, call and complain.  If that doesn’t work, contact your US Senator or Representative.</p>
<blockquote>
<h6>This article was written by <a title="Melissa L. Demorest" href="http://demolaw.com/attorneys/Melissa-Demorest/" target="_blank">Melissa L. Demorest</a>, Associate at <a title="Demorest Law Firm Website" href="http://demolaw.com/" target="_blank">Demorest Law Firm</a>.</h6>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2010/02/24/card-act-how-the-new-credit-card-law-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Smoking Ban &#8211; Summary of House Bill No. 4377</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/12/16/michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/12/16/michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Demorest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Demorest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Michigan Legislature has passed a bill which bans smoking in almost all indoor public venues. This ban has been in the works for a long time; many other States have already enacted similar laws. Governor Granholm is expected to sign the bill into law, and it will go into effect on May 1, 2010. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-716" title="no smoking" src="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/no-smoking1.jpg" alt="no smoking" width="168" height="112" />The Michigan Legislature has passed a bill which bans smoking in almost all indoor public venues. This ban has been in the works for a long time; many other States have already enacted similar laws. Governor Granholm is expected to sign the bill into law, and it will go into effect on May 1, 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“Smoking” is defined as “the burning of a lighted cigar, cigarette, piper or any matter or substance that contains a tobacco product.” There is a ban on smoking in “public places.” A “public place” includes areas owned and operated by the government; areas not owned or operated by the government, but used by the general public for certain specified purposes; and (unless otherwise exempt) a place of employment. The third one covers almost all of the businesses in the State. A “place of employment” is an enclosed indoor area that contains a work area for one or more people.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Business owners are expected to take steps to reasonably prevent customers, employees, or other people from smoking on their premises. Business owners are expected to do ALL of the following:</p>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Clearly and conspicuously post no smoking signs (or the international no smoking symbol) at the entryway and in all buildings where smoking is prohibited.</li>
<li>Remove all ashtrays or other smoking paraphernalia from any place smoking is prohibited under the Act.</li>
<li>Inform individuals smoking in violation of the Act that they are in violation of state law and are subject to penalties.</li>
<li>Refuse to serve an individual smoking in violation of the Act.</li>
<li>Ask an individual smoking in violation of the Act to refrain from smoking, and ask them to leave if they refuse to stop.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If owners do all of the preceding things, they have an affirmative defense against any prosecution against them for a violation of the Act. This means that the business owner can be exempt from penalties under the Act, but only if all of the preceding conditions are met.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act includes a few exceptions. Casinos in existence before the Act can allow smoking in gaming areas only. Casinos built later cannot allow smoking. (The term casino in the bill does not include a casino operated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Thus, the smoking ban does not apply to these casinos.) An existing separate specialty tobacco shop may allow smoking. Cigar bars may also allow smoking (but only the smoking of cigars, not other tobacco products).  The ban also does not apply to motor vehicles.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Overall, business owners should be proactive in preventing smoking in their place of business by following the five requirements described above.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Download a copy of the Bill in PDF format by <a title="Bill" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billenrolled/House/pdf/2009-HNB-4377.pdf" target="_blank">clicking here.</a></p>
<blockquote>
<h6 style="text-align: justify;">This article was written by <a title="Mark S. Demorest - Biography" href="http://demolaw.com/attorneys/Mark-Demorest/" target="_blank">Mark S. Demorest</a>, Managing Member of <a title="Demorest Law Firm Website" href="http://www.demolaw.com" target="_blank">Demorest Law Firm.</a></h6>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/12/16/michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Leads the Way With a New Corporate Form &#8211; The L3C</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/07/20/michigan-leads-the-way-with-a-new-corporate-form-the-l3c/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michigan-leads-the-way-with-a-new-corporate-form-the-l3c</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/07/20/michigan-leads-the-way-with-a-new-corporate-form-the-l3c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>detroitlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Najarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of January 2009, Michigan is one of the few states to offer a new form of business entity.  If your business is for profit, but its primary focus is to accomplish socially beneficial acts, you may want to organize as a low profit limited liability, or an L3C. The L3C is structured like any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-361" title="scrabble" src="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/316824_business_advertisement.jpg" alt="scrabble" width="144" height="108" />As  of January 2009, Michigan is one of the few states to offer a new form  of business entity.  If your business is for profit, but its primary  focus is to accomplish socially beneficial acts, you may want to organize  as a low profit limited liability, or an L3C.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The  L3C is structured like any other limited liability company, with all  the flexibility and advantages of a normal limited liability company,  including being treated as a “pass through” entity for federal tax  purposes.  However, the L3C must satisfy certain criteria to prove  that its main goal is not to make a profit.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">L3C’s  are designed to qualify as a recipient of Program-Related Investments,  or PRIs.  PRIs are IRS-sanctioned investments made by private foundations  to support a charitable project or activity.  As a result of their  charitable purpose, PRIs receive special treatment under federal tax  law.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Historically,  foundations have been reluctant to invest in for-profit businesses through  the use of PRIs because of complex and costly IRS requirements to do  so.  The L3C removes many of these hurdles and costs.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Hopefully,  the L3C will make it easier for foundations to invest in Michigan’s  community and economic revitalization.</p>
<blockquote>
<h6 style="text-align: justify;">This article was written by Natalie C. Najarian, Associate at Demorest Law Firm. <a title="Natalie C. Najarian - Professional Resume" href="http://demolaw.net/attorneys/Natalie-Najarian" target="_blank">Click here to view her professional resume</a>.</h6>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/07/20/michigan-leads-the-way-with-a-new-corporate-form-the-l3c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Legislature Passes New Foreclosure Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/05/28/michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/05/28/michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>detroitlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 19, 2009, the Michigan Legislature passed a package of three bills designed to give homeowners facing foreclosure a ninety-day window to meet with their lender and modify the terms of their mortgage.  With the state facing one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, lawmakers hope these new laws will ease the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 1ex;">
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-154" title="Mortgage" src="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1139531__mortgage_and_finance_consept_1.jpg" alt="1139531__mortgage_and_finance_consept_1" width="98" height="210" /></span>On May 19,  2009, the Michigan Legislature passed a package of three bills designed  to give homeowners facing foreclosure a ninety-day window to meet with  their lender and modify the terms of their mortgage.  With the  state facing one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, lawmakers  hope these new laws will ease the strain on distressed homeowners and  allow them to stay in their homes.  These laws may not be permanent.   Some of the provisions will be in effect for a period of only two years  unless the “sunset” provision is amended.  Governor Granholm  signed the bills on May 21, 2009, and the laws will take effect on July  5, 2009.</p>
<p align="justify">Under the legislation,  a lender may not foreclose on a property claimed as a principal residence  unless the lender first provides written notice to the borrower stating  the reasons that the mortgage loan is in default and the amount due.   The written notice must also designate an agent of the mortgage holder  whom the borrower can contact to attempt to rework the terms of the  loan, and a list of housing counselors prepared by the Michigan State  Housing Development Authority whom the borrower can request to attend  a meeting with the agent of the mortgage holder to assist in modifying  the loan.</p>
<p align="justify">The law further  provides that foreclosure proceedings may not be commenced until ninety  days after the initial notice was mailed if the borrower chooses to  meet with the mortgage holder.  If the borrower and the mortgage  holder reach an agreement to modify the terms of the loan within the  ninety-day period, the mortgage cannot be foreclosed.  Potential  modifications include an interest rate reduction, extension of the amortization  period, deferral of up to 20% of the unpaid balance of the loan, and  reduction or elimination of late fees.</p>
<p align="justify">If the homeowner  meets minimum financial standards specified in the law, but the mortgage  holder refuses to modify the terms of the loan, the lender is required  to go before a judge to attempt to complete the foreclosure.  Additionally,  if notice is not mailed to the borrower as required, the borrower may  bring an action in the circuit court to enjoin the foreclosure.</p>
<p align="justify">The new restrictions  apply only to property claimed as a principal residence by the property  owner.  They do not apply to second homes, rental properties or  other commercial properties.</p>
<p align="justify">For the full  text of the new laws, <a title="PDF Michigan-Enrolled-House-Bill-4453-4455.pdf" href="http://www.demolaw.net/PDF/Michigan-Enrolled-House-Bill-4453-4455.pdf" target="_blank">click here (PDF format)</a>.</p>
<p align="justify">Michigan Legislature Website &#8211; <a title="Michigan Legislature" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(w1f4cuyayi0qcyawn5d3zu55))/mileg.aspx?page=BillStatus&amp;objectname=2009-HB-4453" target="_blank">House Bill 4453</a></p>
<p align="justify">Michigan Legislature Website &#8211; <a title="Michigan Legislature" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(w1f4cuyayi0qcyawn5d3zu55))/mileg.aspx?page=BillStatus&amp;objectname=2009-HB-4454" target="_blank">House Bill 4454<br />
</a></p>
<p align="justify">Michigan Legislature Website &#8211; <a title="Michigan Legislature" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(w1f4cuyayi0qcyawn5d3zu55))/mileg.aspx?page=BillStatus&amp;objectname=2009-HB-4455" target="_blank">House Bill 4455</a></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/05/28/michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

