<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Detroit Business Law &#187; Michigan Legislature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/tag/michigan-legislature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com</link>
	<description>Resources for Metro-Detroit Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Legislature Clarifies Teen Work Hour Law</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/11/22/michigan-legislature-clarifies-teen-work-hour-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michigan-legislature-clarifies-teen-work-hour-law</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/11/22/michigan-legislature-clarifies-teen-work-hour-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=1610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move that will likely help employers, the Michigan Legislature recently amended the youth employment law, MCL 409.111. The amendment clarifies the number of hours that minors between the ages of sixteen and eighteen, who are also enrolled in school, may work. The law now states that minors between those ages may work no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">In a move that will likely help employers, the Michigan Legislature recently amended the youth employment law, MCL 409.111. The amendment clarifies the number of hours that minors between the ages of sixteen and eighteen, who are also enrolled in school, may work. The law now states that minors between those ages may work no more than 24 hours a week when school is in session. Under the previous law, minors could work no more than a combined 48 hours between school and work.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Although the new law is easier for employers to comply with, it may end up reducing the total number of hours a minor may work. For example, if school was in session for only two days in a particular week (at 7 hours per day), the minor would still only be able to work 24 hours. Under the old law, the student would have been able to work 34 total hours during that week.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Although the rest of the law remains the same, it is important for employers to remember that a minor may not work before 6:00am, even on the weekends. This point is especially important for employers in service and hospitality businesses (such as restaurants and golf courses) whose employees’ shifts often start before 6:00 am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/11/22/michigan-legislature-clarifies-teen-work-hour-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention Homeowners: Michigan’s Homestead Exemption Act</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/10/25/attention-homeowners-michigans-homestead-exemption-act/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=attention-homeowners-michigans-homestead-exemption-act</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/10/25/attention-homeowners-michigans-homestead-exemption-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Michael Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=1549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a Michigan homeowner who has recently purchased another home and you are unable to sell your old Michigan home, Michigan law may provide some relief. Michigan homeowners may simultaneously claim a Principal Residence Exemption on two properties so long as certain conditions are met. The law allows property owners who have established [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">If you are a Michigan homeowner who has recently purchased another home and you are unable to sell your old Michigan home, Michigan law may provide some relief. Michigan homeowners may simultaneously claim a Principal Residence Exemption on two properties so long as certain conditions are met.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The law allows property owners who have established a new principal residence to retain a Principal Residence Exemption on property once exempt as the owner&#8217;s principal residence for up to three years if (1) the property is not occupied (2) the property is for sale, (3) the property is not leased and, (4) the property is not used for any business or commercial purposes.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In order to take advantage of this law, one must file a Conditional Rescission of Principal Residence Exemption (Form 4640) to the assessor for the city or township where the property is located on or before May 1 of the first year of the claim. For example, in order to qualify for the 2012 exemption a property owner must file the form by May 1, 2012. This exemption is available for up to three years so long as all the above requirements are met. In addition to the May 1 filing requirement, the owner must annually submit form 4640 on or before December 31 verifying to the assessor that the property for which the Principal Residence Exemption meets the above requirements. In the example above, if the conditional rescission was approved for 2012, the owner would have to submit a new form by December 31, 2012 to verify qualifications for the 2013 tax year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/10/25/attention-homeowners-michigans-homestead-exemption-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New “Catering Permit” for Liquor License Holders</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/04/29/new-catering-permit-for-liquor-license-holders/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-catering-permit-for-liquor-license-holders</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/04/29/new-catering-permit-for-liquor-license-holders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa L. Demorest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa L. Demorest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=1316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Governor Snyder signed a new law permitting certain liquor licensees to apply for and obtain a new “catering permit” (MCL 436.1547).  The catering permit allows existing licensees to provide and serve liquor at private off-site events.  Previously, even if a licensee was providing food service at an off-site event, the licensee could not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/1337577_wine_swirl.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1320" title="1337577_wine_swirl" src="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/1337577_wine_swirl-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Last week, Governor Snyder signed a new law permitting certain liquor licensees to apply for and obtain a new “catering permit” (<a href="http://1.usa.gov/iOBRDc">MCL 436.1547</a>).  The catering permit allows existing licensees to provide and serve liquor at private off-site events.  Previously, even if a licensee was providing food service at an off-site event, the licensee could not also provide and serve the alcoholic beverages, so the event organizer had to obtain those separately.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">To be eligible for a catering permit, the licensee must be a “specially designated distributor, specially designated merchant, or holder of a public on-premises license,” AND must also be a licensed “food service establishment or retail food establishment.”  For example, the following types of businesses might be eligible for a catering permit: a restaurant, hotel, or banquet facility that caters offsite events; or a grocery store that sells liquor and provides catering.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A catering permit holder may use the permit at multiple events and locations simultaneously, and there is no limit on the number of catering permits issued in a particular city or county.  A permit holder must complete an MLCC server training program before beginning to use the permit.  The catering permit application fee is $70 and the annual permit fee is $100.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This new law was originally part of the Sunday liquor sales law that went into effect late in 2010, but Governor Granholm vetoed the catering permit section from that law.  It was recently reintroduced and quickly became law.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For additional analysis of the new law, see the <a href="http://1.usa.gov/kzhu5X">Michigan House and Senate analysis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2011/04/29/new-catering-permit-for-liquor-license-holders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Smoking Ban &#8211; Summary of House Bill No. 4377</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/12/16/michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/12/16/michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Demorest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Demorest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Michigan Legislature has passed a bill which bans smoking in almost all indoor public venues. This ban has been in the works for a long time; many other States have already enacted similar laws. Governor Granholm is expected to sign the bill into law, and it will go into effect on May 1, 2010. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-716" title="no smoking" src="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/no-smoking1.jpg" alt="no smoking" width="168" height="112" />The Michigan Legislature has passed a bill which bans smoking in almost all indoor public venues. This ban has been in the works for a long time; many other States have already enacted similar laws. Governor Granholm is expected to sign the bill into law, and it will go into effect on May 1, 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“Smoking” is defined as “the burning of a lighted cigar, cigarette, piper or any matter or substance that contains a tobacco product.” There is a ban on smoking in “public places.” A “public place” includes areas owned and operated by the government; areas not owned or operated by the government, but used by the general public for certain specified purposes; and (unless otherwise exempt) a place of employment. The third one covers almost all of the businesses in the State. A “place of employment” is an enclosed indoor area that contains a work area for one or more people.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Business owners are expected to take steps to reasonably prevent customers, employees, or other people from smoking on their premises. Business owners are expected to do ALL of the following:</p>
<ol style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Clearly and conspicuously post no smoking signs (or the international no smoking symbol) at the entryway and in all buildings where smoking is prohibited.</li>
<li>Remove all ashtrays or other smoking paraphernalia from any place smoking is prohibited under the Act.</li>
<li>Inform individuals smoking in violation of the Act that they are in violation of state law and are subject to penalties.</li>
<li>Refuse to serve an individual smoking in violation of the Act.</li>
<li>Ask an individual smoking in violation of the Act to refrain from smoking, and ask them to leave if they refuse to stop.</li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align: justify;">If owners do all of the preceding things, they have an affirmative defense against any prosecution against them for a violation of the Act. This means that the business owner can be exempt from penalties under the Act, but only if all of the preceding conditions are met.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Act includes a few exceptions. Casinos in existence before the Act can allow smoking in gaming areas only. Casinos built later cannot allow smoking. (The term casino in the bill does not include a casino operated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Thus, the smoking ban does not apply to these casinos.) An existing separate specialty tobacco shop may allow smoking. Cigar bars may also allow smoking (but only the smoking of cigars, not other tobacco products).  The ban also does not apply to motor vehicles.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Overall, business owners should be proactive in preventing smoking in their place of business by following the five requirements described above.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Download a copy of the Bill in PDF format by <a title="Bill" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/billenrolled/House/pdf/2009-HNB-4377.pdf" target="_blank">clicking here.</a></p>
<blockquote>
<h6 style="text-align: justify;">This article was written by <a title="Mark S. Demorest - Biography" href="http://demolaw.com/attorneys/Mark-Demorest/" target="_blank">Mark S. Demorest</a>, Managing Member of <a title="Demorest Law Firm Website" href="http://www.demolaw.com" target="_blank">Demorest Law Firm.</a></h6>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/12/16/michigan-smoking-ban-summary-of-house-bill-no-4377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Legislature Passes New Foreclosure Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/05/28/michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws</link>
		<comments>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/05/28/michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>detroitlaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 19, 2009, the Michigan Legislature passed a package of three bills designed to give homeowners facing foreclosure a ninety-day window to meet with their lender and modify the terms of their mortgage.  With the state facing one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, lawmakers hope these new laws will ease the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 1ex;">
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-154" title="Mortgage" src="http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1139531__mortgage_and_finance_consept_1.jpg" alt="1139531__mortgage_and_finance_consept_1" width="98" height="210" /></span>On May 19,  2009, the Michigan Legislature passed a package of three bills designed  to give homeowners facing foreclosure a ninety-day window to meet with  their lender and modify the terms of their mortgage.  With the  state facing one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, lawmakers  hope these new laws will ease the strain on distressed homeowners and  allow them to stay in their homes.  These laws may not be permanent.   Some of the provisions will be in effect for a period of only two years  unless the “sunset” provision is amended.  Governor Granholm  signed the bills on May 21, 2009, and the laws will take effect on July  5, 2009.</p>
<p align="justify">Under the legislation,  a lender may not foreclose on a property claimed as a principal residence  unless the lender first provides written notice to the borrower stating  the reasons that the mortgage loan is in default and the amount due.   The written notice must also designate an agent of the mortgage holder  whom the borrower can contact to attempt to rework the terms of the  loan, and a list of housing counselors prepared by the Michigan State  Housing Development Authority whom the borrower can request to attend  a meeting with the agent of the mortgage holder to assist in modifying  the loan.</p>
<p align="justify">The law further  provides that foreclosure proceedings may not be commenced until ninety  days after the initial notice was mailed if the borrower chooses to  meet with the mortgage holder.  If the borrower and the mortgage  holder reach an agreement to modify the terms of the loan within the  ninety-day period, the mortgage cannot be foreclosed.  Potential  modifications include an interest rate reduction, extension of the amortization  period, deferral of up to 20% of the unpaid balance of the loan, and  reduction or elimination of late fees.</p>
<p align="justify">If the homeowner  meets minimum financial standards specified in the law, but the mortgage  holder refuses to modify the terms of the loan, the lender is required  to go before a judge to attempt to complete the foreclosure.  Additionally,  if notice is not mailed to the borrower as required, the borrower may  bring an action in the circuit court to enjoin the foreclosure.</p>
<p align="justify">The new restrictions  apply only to property claimed as a principal residence by the property  owner.  They do not apply to second homes, rental properties or  other commercial properties.</p>
<p align="justify">For the full  text of the new laws, <a title="PDF Michigan-Enrolled-House-Bill-4453-4455.pdf" href="http://www.demolaw.net/PDF/Michigan-Enrolled-House-Bill-4453-4455.pdf" target="_blank">click here (PDF format)</a>.</p>
<p align="justify">Michigan Legislature Website &#8211; <a title="Michigan Legislature" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(w1f4cuyayi0qcyawn5d3zu55))/mileg.aspx?page=BillStatus&amp;objectname=2009-HB-4453" target="_blank">House Bill 4453</a></p>
<p align="justify">Michigan Legislature Website &#8211; <a title="Michigan Legislature" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(w1f4cuyayi0qcyawn5d3zu55))/mileg.aspx?page=BillStatus&amp;objectname=2009-HB-4454" target="_blank">House Bill 4454<br />
</a></p>
<p align="justify">Michigan Legislature Website &#8211; <a title="Michigan Legislature" href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(w1f4cuyayi0qcyawn5d3zu55))/mileg.aspx?page=BillStatus&amp;objectname=2009-HB-4455" target="_blank">House Bill 4455</a></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.detroitbusinesslaw.com/2009/05/28/michigan-legislature-passes-new-foreclosure-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

